<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Even I&#8217;m undecided</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jerrybrito.com/2004/08/03/even-im-undecided/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jerrybrito.com/2004/08/03/even-im-undecided/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lance Jonn Romanoff</title>
		<link>http://www.jerrybrito.com/2004/08/03/even-im-undecided/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Jonn Romanoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 02:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jerrybrito.com/blog/2004/08/03/even-im-undecided/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Jerry, I think you should definitely remove the ABB as it's simply a poor argument even if one is anti-Bush. The most adamant, provided they are rational, Bush critic would not genuinely want "anyone" but Bush in office. Virginia Postrel said of the 2000 race that "Bush is a mixed bag. But I think Al Gore is the devil." I think that also applies to Bush v. Kerry. There is nothing Kerry offers libertarians (aside from being pro-choice, a position not all libertarians share) in comparison to Bush. Maybe in Bush's second term there will be a push to replace the income tax with a VAT - or not. Maybe there will be an attempt to allow some measure of privatization of Social Security - or not. But neither of those things will even be considered with Kerry in office. I'd take a maybe over a definitely no chance. 

Of course, I live in a state that voted more heavily for Gore than any other in 2000, which means whichever way I vote will have no chance of having any impact on the outcome of the election anyway, so for me this is all a mere parlor debate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry, I think you should definitely remove the ABB as it&#8217;s simply a poor argument even if one is anti-Bush. The most adamant, provided they are rational, Bush critic would not genuinely want &#8220;anyone&#8221; but Bush in office. Virginia Postrel said of the 2000 race that &#8220;Bush is a mixed bag. But I think Al Gore is the devil.&#8221; I think that also applies to Bush v. Kerry. There is nothing Kerry offers libertarians (aside from being pro-choice, a position not all libertarians share) in comparison to Bush. Maybe in Bush&#8217;s second term there will be a push to replace the income tax with a VAT - or not. Maybe there will be an attempt to allow some measure of privatization of Social Security - or not. But neither of those things will even be considered with Kerry in office. I&#8217;d take a maybe over a definitely no chance. </p>
<p>Of course, I live in a state that voted more heavily for Gore than any other in 2000, which means whichever way I vote will have no chance of having any impact on the outcome of the election anyway, so for me this is all a mere parlor debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
