The end of broadcasting?
Thanks for visiting this blog for the first time. Check out the home page for the most recent posts, or the archives if you're looking for something in particular. Here are some of our favorite posts, which you might enjoy:
- The Moleskine GTD tabs hack
- No choice but to get things done (on retro computing)
- How to subscribe to toilet paper
If you like what you see, we hope you'll consider subscribing to the RSS feed.
However, I’m not sure this announcement represents the sea change some are making it out to be. I think Mark Cuban’s thinking on this issue has been the most lucid. Broadcast TV will not be destroyed–at least not yet–for a few simple reasons. For one thing, online video on demand overlooks live TV. It’s not very feasible today to stream live events that draw large audiences, such as the World Series for example. (I’m curious about the sort of numbers CBS got for the NCAA tournament. They only streamed the early rounds, right?) Second, VOD is a terrific new channel for content that has established its popularity on traditional media, but how do you establish an online-only hit show? It might work for niche shows, but the TV network model is still best suited for lowest common denominator production and distribution.
So, I don’t think VOD will ever completely supplant pre-scheduled feeds. What might change is how these feeds are distributed. The networks could move online–both feeds and VOD. This would give them a much larger audience than cable systems provide, as well as new revenue opportunities. The only thing that might get in the way is that doing so would undercut the fees that networks get paid by cable operators to carry them on their systems. Eventually, a broadband connection and a video AirPort Express could supplant your need for a cable subscription. If that’s the case, the telcos are engaging in one expensive boondoggle by investing so much to get into the video market.





Comments are closed for this entry.