Amazon affiliate etiquette

Thanks for visiting this blog for the first time. Check out the home page for the most recent posts, or the archives if you're looking for something in particular. Here are some of our favorite posts, which you might enjoy:

If you like what you see, we hope you'll consider subscribing to the RSS feed.

Over at Unclutterer we recently ran a post announcing the impending release of Leopard and how you could get it the cheapest at Amazon. Of course, we get a cut of every sale we generate from our site. I always assume it’s universal knowledge that when blogs link to Amazon, they’re getting an affiliate commission of sales. But invariably there’s a comment chastising us for not being explicit about it. In this case it was from someone named Al who said, “It’s also probably polite to disclose that you’ll be getting a cut from any sales through your ‘pre-order’ link, too.”

I was heartened to see that just about every other commenter came to our defense. That said, however, I notice that others, such as John Gruber in his post about Leopard, make it a point to disclose their cut. So, I’m trying to understand the etiquette here.

Why exactly is it polite to make the disclosure? It’s not as if a reader will pay more because they use our link. They pay exactly the list price; it’s Amazon who pays us the commission. We’re providing a service by highlighting a good deal, and if someone buys, then it obviously was valuable information to them. So what’s the concern?

Oct 19, 2007 | Comments | Tags: , ,

3 comments posted

  1. Posted by John Gruber - 10/20/2007

    I don’t think it’s a matter of politeness; I tend to mention that I’ll be getting a cut from things like this because I think it might make some readers more likely to do it. So instead of thinking of it as disclosure, it’s more like “Hey, you get a great price *and* help kick a few bucks my way.”

  2. Posted by Appfunds - 10/22/2007

    There are always people who complain. Can you blame your tv channel that you followed their commercial and bought something useless ?

  3. Posted by Jon - 11/11/2007

    As a guy who did the journalism thing for a few years, we always mentioned any way we would possibly benefit from recommending a product (or, wouldn’t recommend something if we would benefit) so people wouldn’t think we were recommending it simply for the money. I think that’s where the expectation stems from. It’s odd in a case like this, because you’re simply saying, “Look! A good deal!” When I was an editor, I would have said no to any benefits from linking. But here, it just seems like snarky commenters…

Subscribe to this entry's comments

Post a comment