<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon affiliate etiquette</title>
	<link>http://www.jerrybrito.com/2007/10/19/amazon-affiliate-etiquette/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.jerrybrito.com/2007/10/19/amazon-affiliate-etiquette/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jerrybrito.com/2007/10/19/amazon-affiliate-etiquette/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>As a guy who did the journalism thing for a few years, we always mentioned any way we would possibly benefit from recommending a product (or, wouldn't recommend something if we would benefit) so people wouldn't think we were recommending it simply for the money. I think that's where the expectation stems from. It's odd in a case like this, because you're simply saying, "Look! A good deal!" When I was an editor, I would have said no to any benefits from linking. But here, it just seems like snarky commenters...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a guy who did the journalism thing for a few years, we always mentioned any way we would possibly benefit from recommending a product (or, wouldn&#8217;t recommend something if we would benefit) so people wouldn&#8217;t think we were recommending it simply for the money. I think that&#8217;s where the expectation stems from. It&#8217;s odd in a case like this, because you&#8217;re simply saying, &#8220;Look! A good deal!&#8221; When I was an editor, I would have said no to any benefits from linking. But here, it just seems like snarky commenters&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Appfunds</title>
		<link>http://www.jerrybrito.com/2007/10/19/amazon-affiliate-etiquette/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Appfunds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jerrybrito.com/2007/10/19/amazon-affiliate-etiquette/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>There are always people who complain. Can you blame your tv channel that you followed their commercial and bought something useless ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are always people who complain. Can you blame your tv channel that you followed their commercial and bought something useless ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gruber</title>
		<link>http://www.jerrybrito.com/2007/10/19/amazon-affiliate-etiquette/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gruber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jerrybrito.com/2007/10/19/amazon-affiliate-etiquette/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>I don't think it's a matter of politeness; I tend to mention that I'll be getting a cut from things like this because I think it might make some readers more likely to do it. So instead of thinking of it as disclosure, it's more like "Hey, you get a great price *and* help kick a few bucks my way."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a matter of politeness; I tend to mention that I&#8217;ll be getting a cut from things like this because I think it might make some readers more likely to do it. So instead of thinking of it as disclosure, it&#8217;s more like &#8220;Hey, you get a great price *and* help kick a few bucks my way.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
