Audiobook publishers drop DRM

Thanks for visiting this blog for the first time. Check out the home page for the most recent posts, or the archives if you're looking for something in particular. Here are some of our favorite posts, which you might enjoy:

If you like what you see, we hope you'll consider subscribing to the RSS feed.

According to an NYT story last week, book publishers are getting rid of DRM in audiobooks.

In a letter sent to its industry partners last month, Random House, the world’s largest publisher, announced it would offer all of its audio books as unprotected MP3 files beginning this month, unless retail partners or authors specified otherwise. Penguin Group, the second-largest publisher … now appears set to follow suit.

How come I haven’t heard more about this? Sounds like a big deal. If they’re willing to do that, why won’t they sell ebooks in non-proprietary formats?

Mar 12, 2008 | Comment | Tags: , ,

DRM on 9/11 Commission Report

This is nothing new, but it’s something that grinds my gears to no end, and that’s how the DMCA makes it illegal for me to use works that are completely in the public domain. Researching my previous post, I had occasion to download and read a PDF of the 9/11 Commission Report. This is a report created by the federal government and therefore has no copyright; it is in the public domain. Nevertheless, when I selected some text and and hit ⌘-C to copy it, I get this lovely message:

DRM on 9/11 Commission Report

If I click to enter a password it tells me that I have permission to read and print the document, but not to copy from it. Because there is no copyright, the government has no right to prevent me from copying. I could circumvent the DRM on the PDF, but then it’s possible that I’d be violating the DMCA (not the way I read it, but I’d have to take the risk). Even if I’m not breaking the law by circumventing the DRM, how am I supposed to do that? I have no hacking skills; I’m just a non-profit lawyer trying to read a government document. Normally I’d buy some software utility that would let me do this, but such a utility is something the DMCA definitely prohibits. I better start writing my petition for a Copyright Office exemption next time they grant them in two years.

Feb 1, 2007 | 1 Comment | Tags: , ,

Record Labels Contemplate Unrestricted Digital Music

There’s been much talk this week of (at least one of) the record companies finally coming to their senses and considering selling music online as unprotected MP3s. There are two reasons why this makes eminent sense:

  1. iTunes is the dominant online music retailer and the labels resent that they are beholden to Steve Jobs (and his refusal to employ variable pricing) for access to the iPod. But they don’t have to be. The iPod plays unprotected MP3s. If they set up shop in a form that is at least a little bit as elegant as iTunes, then they could easily do a run-around Apple. They would then also have great leverage next time they have to re-negotiate with Jobs. Apple likes DRM because it solidifies their hold on the MP3 player market.
  2. But won’t unprotected MP3s expose their music to pirating? Wake up and smell reality, folks. DRM does nothing to stop music piracy. Every song in creation is already available as an unprotected MP3 on P2P services such as Kazaa. Selling unprotected files doesn’t mean that they will all of a sudden make available to pirates music that the pirates have never been able to get their hands on. The fact is, the recording industry has been selling music in an unprotected forever in the form of CDs.

Jan 23, 2007 | Comments Off | Tags: , , ,

EMI to sell (some) music in MP3

According to today’s WSJ, Blue Note records (a subsidiary of EMI) will begin selling music in MP3 format via Yahoo. Hopefully this is a sign of things to come, but for now the plan is just for a couple of songs, including a single from Norah Jones’ new album. What’s amazing is that this hasn’t been done already. I’ve always been skeptical that no one at the record companies gets it. But the article explains,

The MP3 announcements highlight a growing internal debate at EMI and other music companies over the correct approach to maximizing the impact of digital sales. Throughout the music industry, executives at record labels who suggested using MP3s for promotions spent years butting heads with their corporate superiors. … Mr. Hochkeppel confirms that he and other Blue Note executives had to overcome what he called “general resistance” on the part of senior EMI executives. He says they were ultimately persuaded there was a need to try fresh approaches to digital sales.

What I fear now is that if this experiment with just a few songs isn’t wildly successful, the suits still won’t get it. They should think about it this way: They have licensing negotiations coming up with Steve Jobs. What a better bargaining chip than the promise of a music store competitor to iTunes that sells MP3s, which play on iPods?

Cross-posted at TLF. You can leave and read comments there. →

Dec 6, 2006 | Comments Off | Tags: , ,

  •  
  •