Viacom Sues Google Over YouTube Clips

Thanks for visiting this blog for the first time. Check out the home page for the most recent posts, or the archives if you're looking for something in particular. Here are some of our favorite posts, which you might enjoy:

If you like what you see, we hope you'll consider subscribing to the RSS feed.

WSJ: “After months of negotiation punctuated by pointed rhetoric, Viacom Inc. sued Google Inc. and its YouTube unit, claiming the popular video-sharing site engages in ‘massive intentional copyright infringement.’” Exactly one year ago (eerie) I hinted that this day would come. How long before Mark Cuban says I told you so?

Mar 13, 2007 | Comments Off | Tags: , , ,

Search, cache, and copyright

Google has lost its copyright appeal against Belgian newspaper publishers. There seem to be conflicting reports about what exactly Google was found liable for. Here’s the WSJ:

A Belgian court ruled Tuesday that Internet search engine Google Inc. violated Belgian copyright law when it published snippets and links to Belgian newspapers on its Web site without permission.

And here’s the AP:

A Brussels court ruled in favor of Copiepresse, a copyright protection group representing 18 mostly French-language newspapers that complained the search engine’s “cached” links offered free access to archived articles that the papers usually sell on a subscription basis.

Snippets and entire cached pages are very different things. But whatever the case, what this case highlights is how unsettled copyright law is as it applies to search engines (and I’ll limit myself to just the U.S.). As for snippets, sure, there’s Kelly v. Arriba Soft, which found that indexing photographs and displaying their thumbnails is a fair use. But that’s just one circuit’s opinion, which is very persuasive, but not controlling in other circuits. Then there’s Perfect 10 v. Google, which cuts in the opposite direction.

Continue reading this post »

Feb 13, 2007 | Comment | Tags: , , , ,

  •  
  •